Untitled

To Pay or Not to Pay         June Stephensons c argonr is ab tabu how manpower commit the around aversion in America and wo gain force are still evaluate to relent their foul divvy up for male pursuit. June suggests that since manpower number wowork force ninety-four to cardinal men should pay one hundred dollars more than in their IRS returns. The cause carries a chauvinist timberland through out the musical passageway and re in wholly(a)y hails carried international when she starts blaming all men beca practice session we are all brothers. I strongly resist! We can non start pointing fingers and formulate men commit most of the crime, so men append to pay more revenuees. I in particular protest with the statement that we all share the blame for crime, because we are all brothers. How can she expect that us as men pile responsibility for actions of other men?         The first creator I disagree is because why sh ould men pay more tax than women, it is homogeneous saying if more Hispanic or macabre men are in prison house Latino and lightlessness men should pay more taxes. Does a commuter that uses the motorway five or more prison terms a week pay more tax than a individual who does non commute to work and uses the freeway five time in a family? Does a taxpayer with five minorren pay more civilise tax than a taxpayer with no kids? We as taxpayers get taxed match to our income non on how much(prenominal) we use tax money.         a nonher(prenominal) reason I strongly disagree with Junes passage is when she says; Your brothers are murders, stock market manipulators, aggroup rapists, robbers, arsonists, litters, polluters, and child abusers. What? Women do non commit any of these crimes. The author thinks that just being a male one has to share the blame for crimes because it is our brothers. That is the most illogical and ridiculous thing, I have ever r ender in my life. Does June share the blame! for those women who are in prison because it is her sisters. Finally I disagree nearly how men do not take responsibly for their region to the fierceness in this country. June says, This Country cannot count on its men to rectify its reddish nature. Maybe not all men take responsibly for their contribution to wildness but not all men are criminals, there are many an(prenominal) men who work hard to rectify violence. Imagine how violence would be if all men did nothing to rectify violence it would be a total chaos. The author makes it sound like there is no hope for violence to end. Building prisons and increase incarceration is not the only solution to the problem of violence. procreation is the way to inning for a better future with little violence not being negative and blaming a special(prenominal) gender.         I do not agree with June Stephensons passage. This passage is written in a chauvinist tone and June puts downwards all men. She prop oses to charge men one hundred dollars in their tax return to tending curtail crime. June says, is $100 a year too much to ask for function oneself to provide crime? My point on the button on why I disagree. Is the tax that June or each woman pays every year too much to help curtain crime? setback to what she believes, my brothers are not murders, robbers, gang up rapist or child abusers. Building prisons is not all that is left as a solution. Education is the way to help decrease crime not blaming all men. If you want to get a full essay, distinguish it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay